Counter-Strike: Rune Eaters vs Bushido Wildcats (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series#3 Group D

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Rune Eaters and Bushido Wildcats are due to meet in a best-of-three at CCT Europe Closed Qualifier Series #3 Group D, with Rune Eaters listed in the 100% YES market. Recent ranking data puts the sides close together rather than in different tiers: GosuGamers had Rune Eaters around 130 and Bushido Wildcats around 117, while Strafe’s snapshot showed Rune Eaters on a poor run, winning only one of their last five, and Bushido Wildcats on two from five. That is the sort of profile that usually produces volatile maps rather than a one-sided series, especially in a Bo3 where map vetoes can flatten a raw ranking edge.

For traders, the main drivers are whether the match starts and whether either team arrives with a changed roster or a late no-show, as those are the usual routes to settlement risk in tightly scheduled online qualifiers. Strafe noted this was the first recorded meeting between the teams and reported Bushido Wildcats as a strong public favourite, which suggests the market price is not being driven by a deep head-to-head history. Dust2.us also listed the fixture as part of the closed qualifier on 21 May, but no team news in the sources reviewed pointed to a confirmed coaching change or a specific absence. If line-ups hold and the series begins on time, the only meaningful swing factor is likely to be map pool performance rather than a large gap in overall form.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Counter-Strike: Rune Eaters vs Bushido Wildcats (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series#3 Group D across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at PolyGram — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.