LoL: DN SOOPers vs Kiwoom DRX (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

DN SOOPers face Kiwoom DRX in an LCK best-of-three that sits heavily towards Kiwoom DRX on current form. DN SOOPers arrive with a 1-14 match record and a 14-game losing streak, alongside a 2-28 map score in the split, which makes a clean upset very difficult to justify on recent performance alone. A 0% crowd line is extreme, but it reflects how one-sided the underlying numbers have been: DN SOOPers have not just lost, they have been consistently losing in maps and rarely taking series beyond the script.

The closest comparable read is a relegation-style mismatch where the market is mainly pricing whether the weaker side can nick a game rather than take the match. Kiwoom DRX’s own match history page shows they are in the same LCK 2026 Rounds 1-2 pool, with the event already well underway, so there is limited room for a structural turnaround from schedule alone. Recent match pages and highlight uploads from 22 May also indicate the teams have been actively playing this week, which means any late surprise is more likely to come from draft or roster news than from a fundamental shift in team strength.

The main catalysts to watch are lineup confirmations, any late substitution or illness report, and whether the series starts on schedule, because this market settles 50-50 if the match is not played or is delayed beyond the settlement window. No recent beat-reporting cited in the search results points to a coaching change or key absence for either side, so the most relevant information is whether the announced rosters match the expected starters. If the match does go ahead as planned, the pricing is likely to remain anchored to DN SOOPers’ season-long collapse unless there is clear evidence of a roster change or forfeiture risk.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.