Indian Premier League: Gujarat Titans vs Chennai Super Kings

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Gujarat Titans meet Chennai Super Kings in Ahmedabad on 21 May, with the market leaning strongly towards GT at 76% YES. That price is consistent with recent head-to-head results and current form: GT have beaten CSK in several recent meetings, including an eight-wicket win in Chennai in the 2026 season, while the broader fixture history still shows CSK can compete in high-scoring conditions but have not consistently checked GT’s top order. In comparable Titan-heavy match-ups, the market has tended to favour the side with the more stable opening pair and the deeper pace attack, which is where Gujarat have looked strongest.

The main things to watch are team news and availability rather than the venue alone. Recent reports around GT’s XI have centred on Shubman Gill, Sai Sudharsan, Jos Buttler, Rashid Khan and the availability of seam options such as Mohammed Siraj and Kagiso Rabada, all of which materially affect their win equity if rotated or carrying niggles. For CSK, much depends on whether they can field a settled bowling group and enough batting around their senior core; when they have been short of wickets through the middle overs, they have often been forced into chase-defending positions. Final XI announcements, any late injury updates, and whether either side carries workload management from a compressed schedule are the practical catalysts before first ball.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Indian Premier League: Gujarat Titans vs Chennai Super Kings across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at PolyGram — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.