Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Vilius Gaubas vs Pablo Llamas Ruiz

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Vilius Gaubas and Pablo Llamas Ruiz are due to meet in Roland Garros qualifying, with the Spaniard arriving in stronger recent clay form. Llamas Ruiz has won both of his qualifying matches in straight sets, beating Nicolas Mejia and Ugo Blanchet without dropping a set, while Gaubas also came through his first two rounds but conceded one set against João Lucas Reis da Silva. That leaves Llamas Ruiz with the cleaner path so far, and his numbers on clay this year have been solid, with a strong win-loss record and a place in the higher end of his career ranking range.

The head-to-head already gives a useful comparator: ATP records show Llamas Ruiz beat Gaubas in their previous meeting, which is the kind of small sample that often matters in qualifying where margins are thin. That said, both players have reached this stage by beating established clay-court opponents, so the market should be read as a live contest rather than a one-sided mismatch. The current 0% yes price is hard to reconcile with the competitive profile of the tie, especially with both men already through two rounds of qualifying.

For traders, the main catalysts are whether the match is completed within the settlement window and whether either player’s schedule changes after the qualifying draw. ATP and sportsbook listings place the fixture in the Roland Garros qualifying slot, and there is no indication from the available reports of injuries or coaching changes affecting either side. If the match is delayed or interrupted, the market rules also matter: an abandoned or postponed tie beyond seven days from the scheduled date would settle 50-50 rather than on the eventual tennis result.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.