Indian Premier League: Gujarat Titans vs Rajasthan Royals

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Gujarat Titans and Rajasthan Royals will meet in an IPL fixture on 29 May 2026, with the match scheduled at a venue yet to be confirmed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India. The 100% implied probability reflects either a fixture certainty or a data-entry anomaly, as no single-match outcome in T20 cricket carries genuine certainty prior to play.

Historically, Gujarat Titans have won 6 of 13 completed matches against Rajasthan Royals in IPL play, with Royals holding a marginal head-to-head advantage. The teams' relative strength in 2025 and early 2026 will determine whether the current probability skew favours either side; Gujarat's domestic form under Ashish Nehra's coaching tenure and Rajasthan's retention of Sanju Samson as captain are material factors. Comparable fixtures between established mid-table franchises typically settle around 48–52% for either team, making a 100% reading structurally implausible unless the market reflects a technical error or a scheduled walkover scenario.

Traders should monitor squad announcements for injury absences among key players—particularly Gujarat's opening combination and Rajasthan's middle-order depth—closer to the May fixture date. The BCCI's confirmation of venue and match scheduling in April 2026 will clarify any logistical risks. Recent reporting from ESPNcricinfo on franchise preparations and auction-window signings will provide context on squad composition. Any late-stage withdrawal or forfeit declaration would trigger alternative resolution pathways under the market's stated conditions.

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Sport Prediction, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Sport Prediction is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Sport Prediction triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.