Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Liquid (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group B

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

3DMAX and Liquid are scheduled to meet in a best-of-three lower-bracket quarter-final at the CS Asia Championships, with the result likely hinging on which side translates recent form into a longer series. The market’s slight 3DMAX edge is consistent with their stronger recent standing in comparable head-to-head spots: they have looked more settled on the bigger map pool and were already competitive against international opposition earlier in 2026, while Liquid have been more volatile in offline play and have had to reset after a mixed run through spring events. In series play, that matters more than raw ranking alone, especially when vetoes can pull the match towards a comfort map rather than a pure firepower contest.

The main things to watch are the final line-ups, map veto timing, and whether either team arrives with any last-minute staff or role changes. Liquid’s recent results on Liquipedia show they have been active across S-tier events, but the team has not always converted close maps into series wins, which makes their opening map vital. 3DMAX, meanwhile, have been on the better end of several tight games and enter with a roster that has been stable enough to build repeated map patterns. If either side confirms a stand-in, illness, or delayed arrival, that would move the price more than the pre-match probability suggests; absent that, the market is mainly a read on which team is more reliable over three maps rather than one.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Liquid (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group B on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.