Roland Garros ATP: Martin Landaluce vs Vit Kopriva

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Martin Landaluce and Vit Kopriva are scheduled to meet in the first or early qualifying round of Roland Garros in late May 2026. Landaluce, a Spanish player ranked outside the top 200, has competed primarily on the Challenger circuit and ITF tours, whilst Kopriva, a Czech competitor, similarly operates in the lower professional tiers. Neither player has secured a main-draw ATP ranking that would guarantee direct entry to Roland Garros, making their participation contingent on qualifying rounds or withdrawal-driven advancement.

The 100% implied probability reflects the market's assessment that this match will occur as scheduled and produce a decisive outcome. Historical precedent suggests qualifying-round matches at Grand Slams rarely cancel outright; weather delays at Roland Garros typically resolve within the seven-day window specified in the settlement criteria. The clay surface and late-May timing favour completion, though rain interruptions are routine. Matches between players of this ranking tier show completion rates exceeding 95% once scheduled, with retirements accounting for most non-finishes.

Traders should monitor the official Roland Garros draw announcement, expected in early May, to confirm both players' qualification or entry status. Any injury announcements from either camp in the fortnight before play would signal withdrawal risk. Kopriva's recent ITF and Challenger results through spring 2026 will indicate form trajectory, whilst Landaluce's performance on Spanish clay—his traditional surface—bears watching. The settlement window closes 7 June, allowing a full week of buffer for rescheduling if weather forces postponement beyond the original 28 May date.

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Sport Prediction, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Sport Prediction, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Sport Prediction is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Sport Prediction?

Zero. Sport Prediction routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Sport Prediction triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.