Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Emilio Nava vs Pedro Martinez

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Emilio Nava and Pedro Martinez are set to meet in Roland Garros qualifying, a match that has drawn a heavy market lean towards Nava. The pricing is broadly in line with recent preview coverage: Nava was installed as the favourite, with one pre-match assessment pointing to a likely three-set win for the American. That said, the matchup is not one-sided on paper. TennisTemple lists Nava at 24 and ranked 97, with Martinez 29 and ranked 141, while both stand at 185cm, suggesting neither has a clear physical edge.

The strongest historical guide is that this is their third career meeting, so there is at least a modest direct sample to judge from rather than relying only on surface form. Comparable French Open qualifying matches between players of similar ranking often turn on who handles longer exchanges and mid-match momentum shifts better, which suits a market that currently prices Nava as highly likely to advance. Reports from Tipstop also point to contrasting recent records, with Nava winning seven of his last ten and Martinez four of ten, while Martinez has a history of dropping sets when expected to control matches. The main catalysts to watch are whether either player is carrying a late fitness issue, any schedule change on Court 7, and whether the match is completed within the settlement window; if it is postponed beyond seven days without a winner, the market would resolve 50-50.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Emilio Nava vs Pedro Martinez on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.