Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Toby Samuel vs Gonzalo Bueno

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Toby Samuel is due to meet Gonzalo Bueno in Roland Garros qualifying, with both players already through two rounds. Samuel arrived after beating Martin Damm in straight sets and then coming through a three-set win over David Goffin, while Bueno progressed with a 6-0, 7-6 win over Florent Bax and a straight-sets victory against Vitaliy Sachko. That leaves a straightforward form line: Samuel has been tested more, but he has also handled a higher-profile opponent and dropped only one set, whereas Bueno has looked cleaner on scoreline and has not yet lost a set.

The pre-match 0% yes price suggests the market is treating the player advance as effectively unresolved or mispriced rather than settled by any strong edge. Comparable qualifier markets often move sharply on last-minute withdrawals, schedule shifts or a late change in the order of play, particularly when the players have not met before. There is no head-to-head history listed in the available results, so there is little direct evidence to separate them beyond current clay form and the quality of opposition faced.

The main catalysts are whether the match goes ahead as scheduled and whether both players are confirmed fit after their second-round efforts. Samuel has played the longer matches, which can matter in best-of-three qualifying if there is a short turnaround, while Bueno’s lighter path may carry a freshness edge. Any official Roland Garros scheduling update, injury report or late walkover would matter more than prior rankings here, because the settlement rules also change the outcome if the match is not completed within the window.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.