Roland Garros ATP: Stan Wawrinka vs Arthur Fils

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Stan Wawrinka and Arthur Fils are due to meet in the Roland Garros first round, with the market heavily favouring Fils. The current 14% crowd-implied probability for Wawrinka reflects the age and form gap between them: Wawrinka remains a three-time major winner with clay-court pedigree, but he is well past his peak, while Fils is the higher-ranked and more explosive player on the rise. Odds markets elsewhere are broadly consistent, with Fils priced as a strong favourite and Wawrinka offered at around 8.3 on one exchange.

For context, this sort of pricing is typical when an experienced name draws a home or top-20-level opponent at a Slam, especially on clay, where younger players with heavier legs and more recent match play usually carry the edge over a veteran whose upside depends on serving well and extending rallies. The main comparable read is that Wawrinka’s chance comes from a competitive, longer match rather than a straight upset line; that is why exact-score markets also lean towards a Fils win in three or four sets rather than a routine blowout.

The key trading catalysts are simple: whether the match goes ahead on the originally scheduled weekend slot, whether either player carries a late fitness issue, and whether the draw schedule changes the surface conditions or court assignment. ATP and sportsbook listings currently point to a standard first-round meeting, and there is no widely reported coaching or injury change attached to either player in the available previews. If the match is delayed or not completed, settlement rules allow for a 50-50 outcome, so the start time and completion status matter as much as the winner.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.