Wimbledon, Qualification WTA: Bianca Andreescu vs Jil Teichmann

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The underlying event is Bianca Andreescu’s second-round qualifying match at Wimbledon against Jil Teichmann, scheduled for 10:30 AM ET on 24 June 2026. Andreescu, the 2019 US Open champion, is navigating a comeback after injuries, having started the 2026 season ranked world No. 228 and now climbing to No. 161 following a fourth-round run at the Italian Open and a first tour-level win of 2026[6][7][8]. Her recent form includes a straight-sets victory over Polona Hercog in qualifying Round 1 at Wimbledon, completed on 23 June[1].

Historically, Andreescu’s 100% crowd-implied probability in this market mirrors past qualifying scenarios where top-tier returners faced lower-ranked opponents in early rounds, particularly when the higher-ranked player had demonstrated recent momentum and tactical refinement. In 2026, her work with new coach Dusan Vemic has focused on tactical and technical adjustments, including movement efficiency to preserve energy—a key factor in her Roland-Garros qualifying win against Daphnee Mpetshi Perricard[2][3]. Comparable cases show that such targeted improvements often translate into decisive qualifying victories, especially when the player has already secured a win in the same tournament.

Traders should monitor Andreescu’s post-match recovery schedule, any updates from her coaching team regarding tactical execution, and Teichmann’s recent match load ahead of this contest. The Wimbledon 2026 qualifying draw and order of play confirm Andreescu’s progression to the second round, with live coverage available on Tennis.com and the official Wimbledon site[4][9]. No major absences or coaching changes have been reported for Teichmann, but Andreescu’s fitness trajectory remains the primary catalyst for market resolution.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Wimbledon, Qualification WTA: Bianca Andreescu vs Jil Teichmann across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at Sport Prediction — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Sport Prediction, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Sport Prediction is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.